Year 2017, Volume 3 , Issue 9, Pages 1112 - 1119 2017-12-27


Harison Mohd SİDEK [1]

The first impression of an academic paper lies in its abstract because it provides the readers with an overview of the quality, relevancy and significance of the paper. Such first overall impression may determine the chances of the full paper being read or simply eliminated; which reader’s decision has an impact on the author’s opportunity either for his work to be cited and disseminated or disregarded. Therefore, it is critically important for academics at higher institutions to be able to present the summary of their works in the most comprehensive, systematic, clear and effective manner; one of the ways is by using the essential rhetorical moves framework as a guideline for abstract writing. The purpose of the present study was to analyze whether or not entrepreneurial educators include essential rhetorical moves in their conference proceedings abstracts using the revised model of Hyland’s (2000) rhetorical moves. In addition, the study also examined the types of rhetorical moves sequence presented in the selected abstracts. Purposive sampling was used for data collection.  Hyland’s (2000) five-moves classification was revised and expanded to include the sixth rhetorical move labeled as Implications of which modification results in a six-moves classification. The six rhetorical moves in the revised model were used as the coding in analyzing the moves structure of the selected abstracts and types of sequence. The data were analyzed using manifest and latent content analyses. The findings reveal that only one abstract satisfies the six rhetorical moves while the other abstract contains only parts of the rhetorical moves with the types of moves sequence being highly varied. The study concludes that while academics do include the essential rhetorical moves when presenting their abstracts, in majority, they are still lacking of awareness in what an abstract should be. The implications of the findings were discussed in terms of awareness-raising amongst academics concerning the importance of producing an abstract that is comprehensive, systematic, clear and effective.

Abstract, academics, academic writing, rhetorical moves, conference proceedings
  • Bonn, S. V., & Swales, J. M. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93-108. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Phd thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic Discourse.(pp.57-75). Lon: Longman. Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 207-224. Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428-446. doi:10.1108/00220410610700953, Hartley, J., & Benjamin, M. (1998). An evaluation of structured abstracts in journals published by the British psychological society. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 443-456. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01303.x, Hongwei, R. & Yuying, L. (2011). A Comparison Study on The Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts in Published Research Articles and Master’s Foreign-Language Theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162-166. Huckin, T. (2006). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context (pp. 93-103). London: Continuum. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical studies of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292. Lau, H. H. (2004). The structure of academic journal abstracts written by Taiwanese PhD students. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 1(1), 1-25. Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302. Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. Samraj, Betty. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introduction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 55-67. Samraj, Betty. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141–156. Santos, M.B.D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text,16, 481-499. Sidek, H.M., Saad, N.S.M., Baharun, H. & Idris, M.M. (2016). An analysis of rhetorical moves in abstract in conference proceedings. International e-Journal of Advances in Social Science, 2(4), 24-31. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suntara, W. & Usaha, S. (2013). Research articles abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variations between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99. Stotesbury, H. (2003). Gaps and False Conclusions: Criticism in Research Article Abstracts across the Disciplines. In Ken Hyland, & Marina Bondi (eds), Academic Discourse Across Disciplines (42, 123-148). New York: Peter Lang.
Primary Language en
Subjects Social
Journal Section Articles

Author: Harison Mohd SİDEK
Country: Malaysia


Publication Date : December 27, 2017

EndNote %0 International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: A RHETORICAL MOVES ANALYSIS OF ABSTRACTS %A Harison Mohd Sidek %T ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: A RHETORICAL MOVES ANALYSIS OF ABSTRACTS %D 2017 %J IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences %P 2411-183X-2411-183X %V 3 %N 9 %R doi: 10.18769/ijasos.401178 %U 10.18769/ijasos.401178