Research Article

COMPARATIVE OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR IN ELITE AND SLUM AREA AT LOCAL ELECTION OF JAKARTA 2017: CASE STUDY POLLING STATION (PS) 06 PEGANGSAAN MENTENG AND POLLING STATION (PS) 52 BUKIT DURI

Volume: 3 Number: 9 December 27, 2017
  • Susi Dian Rahayu *
EN

COMPARATIVE OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR IN ELITE AND SLUM AREA AT LOCAL ELECTION OF JAKARTA 2017: CASE STUDY POLLING STATION (PS) 06 PEGANGSAAN MENTENG AND POLLING STATION (PS) 52 BUKIT DURI

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse of comparative of voting behaviour between elite and slum areas at Local Election of Jakarta 2017. How the comparative of voting behaviour in elite and slum areas are the question of this research. The results of this research are: The first, in elite areas polling station (PS) 6 Pegangsaan, the winner of the local election first round are Ahok-Djarot. They are an incumbent who have some issues like blasphemy, relocation inhumane, and any others. But, in other hand many people argue that Ahok-Djarot is best choice for governor and vice governor for Jakarta because of their achievement in last period, like the cleaning of Ciliwung river, public transportation, and relocation slums areas. But, at second round of local election, Ahok – Djarot are loss in there because most of voters AHY (candidate who loss at first round) voted Anies-Sandi. The most of Ahok-Djarot voters in polling station (PS) 6 said that they are not influenced by a variety of negative issues of the candidate. Second, in slum areas Polling station (PS) 52 Bukit Duri, the winner of the local election are Anies-Sandi. Anies- Sandi are Muslim candidate who have many achievement and their character are friendly, polite and have a good manner. Most of Anies-Sandi voters sure that if Anies-Sandi being governor and vice governor of Jakarta, policy of relocation will be held humanity with emphasis on dialogue. By the result of research, the conclusion is most of voters in Jakarta used rational and sociology factor for their reason to choose governor and vice governor.

Keywords

References

  1. Books: Cambell, August et.al, The American Voter (USA: John Willey and Sons, Inc, 1966) Firmansyah.Marketing Politik “Antara Realitas dan Pemahaman”. Jakarta:Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2007. Jocelyn A.J.,Evans, Voting and Voters: An Introduction, London: SAGE Publication,2004 Schumpeter dalam Georg Sorensen. Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi,Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia yang sedang Berkembang, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003. Nasution, Hariani Fera, .Perilaku Pemilih Pada Pemilihan Gubernur Sumatera Utara Secara Langsung di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu ).2009.USU Repository 2009 Nursal, Adman, Political Marketing,Strategi Memenangkan Pemilu. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004. Upe, Ambo, Sosiologi Politik Kontemporer: Kajian Tentang Rasionalitas Perilaku Politik Pemilih di Era Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung, Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka, 2008. Varma,SP.Teori Politik Modern, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada,2007. Journals: Riswanda Imawan, “Kampanye Tanpa Huru Hara”, dalam Jurnal Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi (Vol. IV, 1999)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Susi Dian Rahayu *
Indonesia

Publication Date

December 27, 2017

Submission Date

September 3, 2017

Acceptance Date

November 23, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 3 Number: 9

EndNote
Rahayu SD (December 1, 2017) COMPARATIVE OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR IN ELITE AND SLUM AREA AT LOCAL ELECTION OF JAKARTA 2017: CASE STUDY POLLING STATION (PS) 06 PEGANGSAAN MENTENG AND POLLING STATION (PS) 52 BUKIT DURI. IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 3 9 936–941.

Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com

17922

The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY

Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2026