Abstract
References
- Bob. Barrett, “Virtual Teaching And Strategies: Transition From Teaching Traditional Classes To Online Classes.” Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Vol. 3, no. 12, p. 18, 2010. Hake, Richard R. "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses." American Journal of Physics 66.1, p. 64-74, 1998. X. Karanezi, E. Rapti, G. Halimi, “Traditional and Modern Teaching Methodologies: Which One is More Successful and What are the Challenges?” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, S2, p. 311, 2015. T. Ashraf, “Information Technology Public Policy: a socio-human profile of Indian digital revolution.” Elsevier, p. 309, 2004. Weltman, David. A COMPARISON OF Traditional and Active Learning Methods: An Empirical Investigation Utilizing a linear mixed model. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2007. Bonwell, Charles, and James Eison. "Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom AEHE-ERIC higher education report No. 1." 1991. Bloom, Benjamin Samuel. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Affective domain, by DR Krathwohl, BS Bloom [and] BB Masia. Vol. 2. D. McKay, 1956. Hoellwarth, Chance, and Matthew J. Moelter. "The implications of a strong curriculum in introductory mechanics." American Journal of Physics 79.5, p. 540-545, 2011. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_learning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
Abstract
In this paper an attempt has been made to analyze
the role of smart and conventional teaching. It is observed that the impact of
Information Technology in education sector, has introduced new approaches to
the teaching method. Education plays substantial role in the progress and
development of every nation. Use of Information Technology accelerated the
growth of this field. Earlier, conventional mode of teaching was popular but
certain barriers have been noticed in student-teacher interaction, i.e.,
complete dependency on instructor, language barrier, lack of tangible study
materials, etc. The inception of new technology in the field of education
brought freshness in teaching methodologies. As a result teaching in new era
has become interesting and teacher student friendly. It can be marked one step
ahead from chalk and talk teaching method. Nowadays learning materials like
e-books and video lectures are easily available on internet sites in different
subjects for keen learners. As more and more new courses in different areas are
being introduced, consequently number of students preferring online mode of
learning. Information Technology has
made complex subjects interesting and comprehensive. Though it has
revolutionized the entire education system, but the role of conventional
teaching can’t be ignored. Education is not only about gaining bookish
knowledge but preparing a student to become a good citizen in terms of carrying
social values, human emotions, behavior, work ethics and other skills as a man
of society. It brings students closer to the teacher whose experiences and
interaction cultivates those skills along with subject knowledge. So for the
best outcome conventional teaching must employ the smart technology based
teaching methods. Smart method will help in developing the LSRW (Listening,
Speaking, Reading and Writing) skills of students which is essential for their
professional growth, and conventional teaching will contribute in their
personal enrichment.
References
- Bob. Barrett, “Virtual Teaching And Strategies: Transition From Teaching Traditional Classes To Online Classes.” Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Vol. 3, no. 12, p. 18, 2010. Hake, Richard R. "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses." American Journal of Physics 66.1, p. 64-74, 1998. X. Karanezi, E. Rapti, G. Halimi, “Traditional and Modern Teaching Methodologies: Which One is More Successful and What are the Challenges?” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, S2, p. 311, 2015. T. Ashraf, “Information Technology Public Policy: a socio-human profile of Indian digital revolution.” Elsevier, p. 309, 2004. Weltman, David. A COMPARISON OF Traditional and Active Learning Methods: An Empirical Investigation Utilizing a linear mixed model. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2007. Bonwell, Charles, and James Eison. "Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom AEHE-ERIC higher education report No. 1." 1991. Bloom, Benjamin Samuel. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Affective domain, by DR Krathwohl, BS Bloom [and] BB Masia. Vol. 2. D. McKay, 1956. Hoellwarth, Chance, and Matthew J. Moelter. "The implications of a strong curriculum in introductory mechanics." American Journal of Physics 79.5, p. 540-545, 2011. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_learning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2017 |
| Submission Date | September 6, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017Volume: 3 Issue: 8 |
Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com
The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2024