Research Article

THE PROBLEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE BORDERLANDS OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE AT THE TURN OF THE 19-20TH CENTURIES IN THE TEACHING OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL DISCIPLINES

Volume: 5 Number: 15 January 14, 2020
  • Alexander Petukhov
  • Tatyana Kozhina *
EN

THE PROBLEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE BORDERLANDS OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE AT THE TURN OF THE 19-20TH CENTURIES IN THE TEACHING OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL DISCIPLINES

Abstract

The article analyzes the approaches to the consideration of the imperial policy of Russia at the turn of the 19-20th centuries in the teaching of historical and legal disciplines in Russian universities. The authors state the discrepancy between the results of modern research on the Russian empire and the idea of the Russian empire as an ethnically homogeneous state that remains in the practice of teaching. Adjusting such an outdated view requires greater attention to the issues of heterogeneity of the Russian empire, its place among other empires at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, the nature and typology of the Russian imperial borderlands and their relationship with the imperial center. Using the example of the Volga-Ural region, the authors consider the processes that took place at that imperial borderland of Russia at the turn of the 19-20th centuries, and its place in imperial politics. The Volga-Ural is characterized as the first imperial borderland of the Russian Empire, where a model of Russian imperial politics was formed. The central place in Russian imperial politics was played by the Christianization of the local population, which could be either violent or voluntary. The results of the imperial confessional policy were contradictory. The success of Christianization led to the beginning of the 20th century to the formation in the region of new identities among residents, who perceived themselves as Orthodox, but distinguished themselves from the ethnically Russian population. On the other hand, the opposition to Christianization by local Muslims contributed to the identity of the Volga-Ural Tatars, which was based on adherence to Islam. The article offers a number of specific recommendations for updating the teaching of historical and legal disciplines by introducing into their content issues of imperial control at the borderlands of Russia at the turn of the 19-20th centuries.

Keywords

References

  1. David-Fox, M. ‘Otsy, deti i vnuki v amerikanskoi istoriografii tsarskoi Rossii.’ In Amerikanskaya rusistika: vekhi istoriografii poslednikh let, ed. Michael David-Fox, 5-47. Samara, 2000. Geraci, R. (2001) Window on the East: National and Imperial Identities in Late Tsarist Russia, Ithaca - London. Khodarkovsky, M. (1996) ‘“Not by Word Alone”: Missionary Policies and Religious Conversion in Early Modern Russia,’ Comparative Studies in Sociology and History, 38 (2), 267-293. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, D. (2010) Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration, New Haven.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Alexander Petukhov
Russian Federation

Tatyana Kozhina *
Russian Federation

Publication Date

January 14, 2020

Submission Date

October 30, 2019

Acceptance Date

December 14, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 15

EndNote
Petukhov A, Kozhina T (January 1, 2020) THE PROBLEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE BORDERLANDS OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE AT THE TURN OF THE 19-20TH CENTURIES IN THE TEACHING OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL DISCIPLINES. IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 5 15 1434–1438.

Cited By

Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com

17922

The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY

Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2026