METHODICAL ASPECTS OF THE PLANNING PROCESSES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Evelina Parashkevova; Michail Chipriyanov; Hristo Sirashki; Elitsa Lazarova; Nadezhda Veselinova

doi:10.18769/ijasos.1144380

EN

METHODICAL ASPECTS OF THE PLANNING PROCESSES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Abstract

Public sector planning has always been in the focus of research interests of scientists. The many functions that administrations perform and the broad spectrum of public policies that they manage require the implementation of adequate planning tools to ensure integration, quality and realism. Planning processes are accompanied by a number of problems. Some of the basic ones result from the lack of adequate methodology. The development of the practice poses new challenges to the methods of strategic analysis and planning from the point of view of their applicability in the public sector. The need for specific knowledge and skills for planning, digitalization and software solutions largely determine the future of the planning function. It will become more and more automated and more and more routine. However, this does not mean easier planning, better strategy and more adequate planning decisions. On the contrary, the fact that planning is a highly intellectual activity requiring analytical skills, strategic proactive thinking necessarily requires the leading role to continue to be performed by trained professionals, and technology to be a tool to support and analyse alternatives. The aim of this article is to outline perspectives for the development of planning processes in public sector administrations in Bulgaria, considering the strategic, regulatory and methodological framework for planning. The study of existing good practices for organizing and managing the planning processes in the administration is refracted through the prism of the experience and expertise of the public sector in Bulgaria and the environment and the requirements that must be considered by the administrations carrying out planning activities. A comparative analysis of traditional approaches to process management and flexible management methods is made and based on critical points that should be put on the agenda in regulating planning processes in Bulgaria and integrating them into public sector practice. Through induction, deduction and reduction are outlined guidelines for future research and specific recommendations to the public sector regarding the organizational management of planning processes.

Keywords

References

Arabadzhiyski, N. (2012). PROBLEMS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Yearbook of the Center for Public Administration of New Bulgarian University (NBU), 6, 1-33. Retrieved from http://ebox.nbu.bg/pa2011/5_N.ARABADJIISKI.pdf
Augustine, S. P. (2005, December). Agile Project Management: teering from the edges. Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, №12.
Bindu, N., Prem Sankar, C., & Satheesh Kumar, K. (2019). From conventional governance to e-democracy: Tracing the evolution of e-governance research trends using network analysis tools. Government Information Quarterly 36, 385-399.
Borisov, B. (2002). Sustainable development of municipalities: strategic decisions and evaluation models. Economics World.
Borisov, B. (2019). Administrative capacity of public administration in Bulgaria. Sofia: Stefanov and Sasheva.
Borisov, B. (2021). Index of Administrative Capacity of the Public Administration of the Republic of Bulgaria for 2020. Academic Publisher Tsenov.
Borisov, B., Bogdanova, M., Parashkevova, E., Chipriyanov, M., Lazarova, E., & Stoyanova, M. (2020). New paradigms in planning. Collective monograph. Ruse: Profi Print.
Bozhinova, M. (2019). Current aspects of the management of the tourist destination and the Bulgarian projection. Tourism in the new millennium - state and prospects (p. 14). Svishtov: AP Tsenov.

Bozhinova, M., & Georgieva, K. (2019). ORGANIZATIONS FOR TOURISM REGION MANAGEMENT IN BULGARIA – TRENDS AND CHALLENGES. Trakia Journal Of Sciences, 17(Suppl. 1), 365-370. doi: doi: 10.15547/tjs.2019.s.01.060
Concil of European Municipalities and Regions. (2015, October). The implementation of the Integrated Teritorial Investments (ITI) by Member States. Retrieved from CCRE CEMR Local&Regional Europe: https://www.ccre.org/img/uploads/piecesjointe/filename/CEMR_Study_ITI_EN-0.pdf
Council of Ministers. (2010). Strategic Planning Methodology in the Republic of Bulgaria. Retrieved from Public Consultation Portal: https://www.strategy.bg/Publications/View.aspx?lang=bg-BG&Id=90
Council of Ministers. (2021, December 21). The Council of Ministers Public Consultation Portal. Retrieved from https://www.strategy.bg/StrategicDocuments/
Decision № 140 of the Council of Ministers of 17.03.2014. (2014, March 13). Strategy for development of the public administration 2014 - 2020.
DeMarco, T. (1997). The Deadline: A Novel About Project Management. New York: Dorset House.
Draft Law on Strategic Planning of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2019, March 19). presented on March 19, 2019 .
European Commision. (2021). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2021, Bulgaria. Retrieved from European Commission, Shaping Europe`s digital future: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-bulgaria
Ferry, M. (2019, March). Integrated Territorial Investments as an effective tool of the Cohesion Policy. Retrieved from European Parlament: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/162823/25032019_CONT_Briefing_ITI_Final.pdf
Gab Analysis: The starting point for successful strategic planning. (2020, August 24). Retrieved from https://www.ionos.com/startupguide/grow-your-business/gap-analysis/
Garcia-Ayllon, S. (2018, December 12). The Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) of the Mar Menor as a model for the future in the comprehensive management of enclosed coastal seas. Ocean & Coastal Managment, 166, 82-97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.004.
GATE City Digital Twin Pilot Project. (2020). Retrieved from GATE: https://gate-ai.eu/en/research/gate-city-digital-twin-pilot-project/
Jongerius, P., Offermans, A., Vanhoucke, A., & Sanwikarja, P. (2013). Get Agile!: Scrum for UX, Design & Development. Laurence King Publishing.
Kociuba, D. (2018). IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL INVESTMENTS IN POLAND – RATIONALE, RESULTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE(37(4)), 81-98.
Kuappakangas, P., Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Laitinen, I., Ruuskanen, O., & Rannisto, P. (2019). Examining the Core Dilemmas Hindering Big Data-related Transformation in Public-Sector Organizations. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, XII(No. 2), 131-156. Retrieved December 2021
Lehman, M. (2001). Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management. Annals of Software Engineering 11.
Mertins, K., & Kohl, H. (2012, February 24). Benchamring-Techniken. Retrieved from http://www.innovation-aktuell.de/kl0322.htm
Methodology for strategic planning in the Republic of Bulgaria. (2010). Methodology for strategic planning in the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia: approved by the Council for Administrative Reform.
Milikina, S., Tsenkov, A., Todorova, S., Borisova, I., Dzhildzhov, A., Milinov, R., . . . Stoitseva, M. (2019). Methodology for Conducting Functional Analysis. Sofia.
Milikina, S., Tsenkov, A., Todorova, S., Borisova, I., Dzhildzhov, A., Milinov, R., . . . Stoitseva, M. (2019). The Manual for Application of the Methodology for Conducting Functional Analysis. Sofia.
Motives for a draft law on strategic planning of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2019). Motives for a draft law on strategic planning of the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia: By Council of Ministers.
National Assembly. (2019). Draft Law on Strategic Planning of the Republic of Bulgaria. Retrieved from https://www.strategy.bg/PublicConsultations/View.aspx?lang=bg-BG&Id=4215
Sancino, A., & Hudson, L. (2020). Leadership in, of, and for smart cities - case studies from Europe, America, and Australia. Public Managment Review, 22(No. 5), 701–725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718189
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum Guide. The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game.
Serebryakova, N. (2007). Benchmarking or business intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.chel.ru/practice/index.php?id=11 SG No. 21 of 13 March. (2020, March 13). Law on administration. Law on administration.
Suomalainen, T., Kuusela, R., & Tihinen, M. (2015). Continuous planning: an important aspect of agile. Agile Systems and Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, 132 - 162.
Suri, P. K. (2014). Flexibility of processes and e-governance performance. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Volume 8, Number 2, 230-250.
Sutherland, J. (2014). Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time. New York: Crown Business.
Terrados, J. (2005, August 24). Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis. Retrieved from http://jperera.pro.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/regionalenergyplanningthroughswotanalysis-16621.pdf
Truex, D. B. (1999, August). Growing systems in an emergent organization. Commun. ACM 42, 8, pp. 117–123.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Evelina Parashkevova ^*
Bulgaria

Michail Chipriyanov
Bulgaria

Hristo Sirashki
Bulgaria

Elitsa Lazarova
Bulgaria

Nadezhda Veselinova
Bulgaria

Publication Date

September 4, 2022

Submission Date

July 16, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 2, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 23

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.1144380

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA54KE56HB

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Parashkevova E, Chipriyanov M, Sirashki H, Lazarova E, Veselinova N (September 1, 2022) METHODICAL ASPECTS OF THE PLANNING PROCESSES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR. IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 8 23 433–444.

METHODICAL ASPECTS OF THE PLANNING PROCESSES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Abstract

Keywords

Öz

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite