Abstract
The recent innovative technologies have dramatically changed the future of humanity. There are many pros & cons of this excessive impact of technology on our lives. The main goal behind the advancement of these technologies was to increase our day to day efficiency. At a larger scale, it aimed on more productivity from the industrial zones, alleviation of poverty and improve life index of people. This era of smart society, which is a result of investing huge amount of resources on IT Infrastructure of Smart Cities to automate life of its citizens with a quest for perfection has raised the bars for competence level required in all walks of life. The students of Smart Societies of the future will be seeking state of the art knowledge platforms and teaching aids that would be interactive and effective for attaining knowledge. On the other hand, the teachers of this smart era would have to enhance their knowledge, teaching skills and expertise as per the demands and needs of these students. The educationists would have to educate these students to deal and compete with machines (e.g. in Industry 4.0 where robots will be replacing workers at different levels of industry and eventually will totally replace human workforce). This is essentially a paradigm shift that requires non trivial forms of teaching and learning methods for preparing the students to meet the needs of increasingly complex digitally driven AI based Smart Societies. We discuss these challenges of the Smart Societies and their possible solutions by positively introducing these new technologies in pedagogy, curriculum design, ICT skills, fast learning, technology oriented and outcome based educational environment, where student will not feel any change while moving from classroom to the industry.
Keywords
Actuators OBE IoT Smart Society industrial 4.0 PLO CLO 5G Cyborgs AIEd
References
- 1. Anca Mustea, Mirela Murean, Cosmin Herman (2014), Integrating E-learning into the trans-disciplinary methodology as a solution to the challenges of 21st century society. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 366 – 372. 2. Pacific Policy Research Center. 2010. 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division. 3. Towards defining 21st Century Competencies for Ontario, 21st century foundation document for discussion. Winter (2006). 4. Cynthia Luna Scott. THE FUTURES of LEARNING 1: Why must learning content and methods change in the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 13] 5. https://www.computer.org/web/computingnow/archive/iot-for-21st-century-learners-june-2017-introduction 6. N. Park and Y. Ko, “Computer Education’s Teaching-Learning Methods Using Educational Programming Language Based on STEAM Education,” IFIP Int’l Conf. on Network and Parallel Computing, 2012. 7. M. Resnick et al., “Scratch: Programming for All,” Comm. ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, 2009, pp. 60-67. 8. E.R. Halverson and K. Sheridan, "The Maker Movement in Education," Harvard Educational Rev., 84.4, 2014, pp. 495-504. 9. SEcube information video: http://www.secube.eu/media/video.html 10. https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317 11. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/docs/education/education_internet.pdf 12. Cynthia Luna Scott, (2015), Redefining learning content and methods in the 21st century 13. https://blog.bosch-si.com/building/iot-in-education-by-designing-smart-learning-environments/ 14. https://learn.ni.com/teach/resources/333/ni-iot-education-beta 15. Veeramanickam et. al, (2014), IOT enabled Futurus Smart Campus with effective E-Learning: i-Campus 16. Daniel Palma at. al. (2016), An Internet of Things Example: Classrooms Access Control over Near Field Communication 17. Jai W. Kang, (2017), Teaching IoT (Internet of Things) Analytics. 18. Shahbaz Pervez, Malik Misbah, Humaira Yaqub, Mahjabeena, “PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR SECURITY & PRIVACY IN CYBER ERA OF CLOUD COMPUTING”, “IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computers, Communication, Mechanical and Computing (EECCMC)” 28-29 January 2018, Villore district Tamil Nado India 19. Yuqiao Yang, (2016). Construction of Distance Education Classroom in Architecture Specialty Based on Internet of Things Technology Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. 20. Patrice Gans The Fraser-Woods School, Newtown, CT, “The benefits of using scratch to introduce basic programming concepts in the elementary classroom”, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges archive, Volume 25 Issue 6, June 2010 21. Jing He et. Al “Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) into STEM undergraduate education: Case Study of a Modern Technology Infused Courseware for Embedded System Course.” 22. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf 23. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. 24. Shahbaz Pervez, Nasser Abosaq, Gasim Alandjani, “IoT Services Impact as a Driving Force on Future Technologies by Addressing Missing Dots” , 16th International Conference on Applied Computer Science (ACS '16), Istanbul, Turkey, 15-17 April 2016. 25. https://santarosa.edu/course-slo/assessment 26. http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf 27. Shahbaz Pervez, Nasser Abosaq, Gasim Alandjani, Adeel Akram, “Internet of Things (IoT) as beginning for Jail-Less Community in Smart Society ”, “IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computers, Communication, Mechanical and Computing (EECCMC)” 28-29 January 2018 at priyadarshini engineering college, Villore district Tamil Nado India.
Abstract
References
- 1. Anca Mustea, Mirela Murean, Cosmin Herman (2014), Integrating E-learning into the trans-disciplinary methodology as a solution to the challenges of 21st century society. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 366 – 372. 2. Pacific Policy Research Center. 2010. 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division. 3. Towards defining 21st Century Competencies for Ontario, 21st century foundation document for discussion. Winter (2006). 4. Cynthia Luna Scott. THE FUTURES of LEARNING 1: Why must learning content and methods change in the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 13] 5. https://www.computer.org/web/computingnow/archive/iot-for-21st-century-learners-june-2017-introduction 6. N. Park and Y. Ko, “Computer Education’s Teaching-Learning Methods Using Educational Programming Language Based on STEAM Education,” IFIP Int’l Conf. on Network and Parallel Computing, 2012. 7. M. Resnick et al., “Scratch: Programming for All,” Comm. ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, 2009, pp. 60-67. 8. E.R. Halverson and K. Sheridan, "The Maker Movement in Education," Harvard Educational Rev., 84.4, 2014, pp. 495-504. 9. SEcube information video: http://www.secube.eu/media/video.html 10. https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317 11. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/docs/education/education_internet.pdf 12. Cynthia Luna Scott, (2015), Redefining learning content and methods in the 21st century 13. https://blog.bosch-si.com/building/iot-in-education-by-designing-smart-learning-environments/ 14. https://learn.ni.com/teach/resources/333/ni-iot-education-beta 15. Veeramanickam et. al, (2014), IOT enabled Futurus Smart Campus with effective E-Learning: i-Campus 16. Daniel Palma at. al. (2016), An Internet of Things Example: Classrooms Access Control over Near Field Communication 17. Jai W. Kang, (2017), Teaching IoT (Internet of Things) Analytics. 18. Shahbaz Pervez, Malik Misbah, Humaira Yaqub, Mahjabeena, “PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR SECURITY & PRIVACY IN CYBER ERA OF CLOUD COMPUTING”, “IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computers, Communication, Mechanical and Computing (EECCMC)” 28-29 January 2018, Villore district Tamil Nado India 19. Yuqiao Yang, (2016). Construction of Distance Education Classroom in Architecture Specialty Based on Internet of Things Technology Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. 20. Patrice Gans The Fraser-Woods School, Newtown, CT, “The benefits of using scratch to introduce basic programming concepts in the elementary classroom”, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges archive, Volume 25 Issue 6, June 2010 21. Jing He et. Al “Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) into STEM undergraduate education: Case Study of a Modern Technology Infused Courseware for Embedded System Course.” 22. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf 23. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. 24. Shahbaz Pervez, Nasser Abosaq, Gasim Alandjani, “IoT Services Impact as a Driving Force on Future Technologies by Addressing Missing Dots” , 16th International Conference on Applied Computer Science (ACS '16), Istanbul, Turkey, 15-17 April 2016. 25. https://santarosa.edu/course-slo/assessment 26. http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf 27. Shahbaz Pervez, Nasser Abosaq, Gasim Alandjani, Adeel Akram, “Internet of Things (IoT) as beginning for Jail-Less Community in Smart Society ”, “IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computers, Communication, Mechanical and Computing (EECCMC)” 28-29 January 2018 at priyadarshini engineering college, Villore district Tamil Nado India.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2018 |
| Submission Date | July 24, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018Volume: 4 Issue: 11 |
Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com
The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2024