Abstract
Cinema politics is
based on the combination of the different features such as interaction with
society international circulation, industry specific settlement, and
relationship with technology, industry, art, and mass media. The policies
created for the cinema field are under the influence of economic and cultural
values. Interventionism, protectionism and support should be assessed in this
context in the field of cinema. From the beginning until 1987, Turkish cinema
has been developed and developed with its own internal dynamics without being
supported by the state. The Turkish cinema has developed its own production
style without rely on the non-sector capital and with the domestic audience in
the domestic market without receiving state support. State support to the
cinema which has been recently restructured has been provided by the Law No.
5224 on the Evaluation, Classification and Supporting of Cinema Films. It is
the first time that Turkish cinema has a Law. It has been accepted in the
Assembly that it is a sector in which cinema is supposed to be supported and
promoted.
The purpose of this
study to assert the film support systems briefly and particularly present a
general evaluation of the consequences the Regulations for Supporting as well
as Supervising and Classifying the Cinema Films on the basis of the Law No.
5224 pertaining to the Evaluation, Classification and Support of the Cinema
Films with respect to the Turkish cinema in the frame of cinema policies.
Keywords
References
- Aas, N. (2001). Challenges in European Cinema and Film Policy. November 20, 2006, http://www.obs.coe.int/online-publication/reports/aas.htm Doğan, Y. (2004, July 20). Silah Bir Sinema İki.Hürriyet Gazetesi,13 Doğan, D.Ç. (2010). " Sinemanın Toplum Hayatındaki Rolü ve Denetimi" Hukuk Gündemi Dergisi, Sayı:2 Erkılıç, H. (2008). " Sinema Politikaları Çerçevesinde Filmlere Sağlanan Devlet Desteği" İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.33 No. 1 Hızlan, D. (2005, August 12). Sinemacılara İpotek Baskısı.Hürriyet Gazetesi, 21. Kıvanç, A. (2004, July 16). Sinema Yasası Çıktı Tartışmalar Sürecek. Radikal Gazetesi, 19. Özonur, D.Ç. (2010). Avrupa Birliği Uyum Yasaları Çerçevesinde Film Denetleme Sisteminde Yapılan Değişiklikler. http://defnecoloğlu.com/wordpress/?p:70 Ulusoy, N. (2003). Avrupa Merkezli Görsel İşitsel Kuruluşlar ve Türk Sineması. Mine Gencel Bek (Edited by), Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye'de İletişim Politikaları. Ankara, Ümit Yayıncılık
Abstract
References
- Aas, N. (2001). Challenges in European Cinema and Film Policy. November 20, 2006, http://www.obs.coe.int/online-publication/reports/aas.htm Doğan, Y. (2004, July 20). Silah Bir Sinema İki.Hürriyet Gazetesi,13 Doğan, D.Ç. (2010). " Sinemanın Toplum Hayatındaki Rolü ve Denetimi" Hukuk Gündemi Dergisi, Sayı:2 Erkılıç, H. (2008). " Sinema Politikaları Çerçevesinde Filmlere Sağlanan Devlet Desteği" İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.33 No. 1 Hızlan, D. (2005, August 12). Sinemacılara İpotek Baskısı.Hürriyet Gazetesi, 21. Kıvanç, A. (2004, July 16). Sinema Yasası Çıktı Tartışmalar Sürecek. Radikal Gazetesi, 19. Özonur, D.Ç. (2010). Avrupa Birliği Uyum Yasaları Çerçevesinde Film Denetleme Sisteminde Yapılan Değişiklikler. http://defnecoloğlu.com/wordpress/?p:70 Ulusoy, N. (2003). Avrupa Merkezli Görsel İşitsel Kuruluşlar ve Türk Sineması. Mine Gencel Bek (Edited by), Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye'de İletişim Politikaları. Ankara, Ümit Yayıncılık
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 30, 2017 |
| Submission Date | April 27, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017Volume: 3 Issue: 7 |
Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com
The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2024