Year 2018, Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 813 - 822 2019-01-10


Aditi Tyagi [1]

22 89

The shift from government to governance necessitated the role of multiple stakeholders in policy process and called for an approach that could optimally facilitate the process. Resulting adoption of the stakeholder engagement approach in public policy from the domain of corporate governance has come as a mainstay as one of the most sought after diagnostic technique for the achievement of good governance in the realm of public delivery. Although the concept of stakeholder engagement possesses an imported character, it is being widely practiced across all kinds of public and private organizations whereby the various stakeholders enjoy the opportunity to influence decision-making in a desired manner. Public policy process has also acknowledged and made use of this concept as a tool, both formal and informal, for policy development, monitoring and evaluation realizing and admiring the intertwined interests of the two domains, as also the stakeholders getting increasingly involved into the process of public policy thereby enabling better alignment of the public policy with their needs and aspirations than ever before. Public policy and governance are closely interwoven and interdependent for their efficiency and efficacy. It is due to the shift experienced in both these spheres as a clear impact of the global changes of neo-liberalism and globalization that enhanced role has been assigned to informed, aware and proactive stakeholders. Stakeholders hold a substantial position in terms of institutional framework as well as achievement of the established goals. Stakeholder engagement, an effort towards collaborative partnerships and proactive involvement towards the exchange of information, ideas and resources critically important for a contextual policy perspective, therefore, forms an integral part of present times policy process and is a significant determining factor in policy development right from identifying priorities to drafting a blueprint, from formulation to implementation, for decision-making and monitoring at all levels. The present paper attempts to understand the prospects, significance and challenges of stakeholder engagement in public policy sphere of India. It intends to draw inference on the basis of document analysis as regards some of the current Indian government’s development initiatives, like Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Namami Gange Programme, Smart City Mission and assess the status of stakeholder engagement therein. The prerequisites of stakeholder engagement are many and complex calling for a continuum across the multiple stakeholders associated with a project in varying capacities and differing levels of engagement as per the authority or power they wield to influence decisions. Although the concept of stakeholder engagement is gaining increased acceptance and significance across various domains, there are yet no established normative frameworks and practices of the stakeholder engagement method courtesy the varying social, economic and political conditions across settings. Besides, being a direct human dimension, engagement of stakeholders is difficult to be quantitatively measured. Public policy demands a long-term, persistent and non-manipulative commitment on the part of the policy-makers and stakeholders to optimally reap the benefits of stakeholder engagement. Nonetheless, appropriate and effective stakeholder engagement in itself is not a guarantee to the success of a project or policy. 
Stakeholder engagement, Public policy, India, Issues and challenges, Development initiatives
  • Arroyo, C. A. (2013). Public policy and stakeholders. Retrieved on 18.02.2018 from Bharati, L., Sharma, B.R. & Smakhtin, V. (2016). The Ganges River Basin: Status and Challenges in Water, Environment and Livelihoods. Routledge. Bijlsma, R. M., Bots, P. W. G., Wolters, H. A., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). An empirical analysis of stakeholders’ influence on policy development: The role of uncertainty handling. Ecology and Society 16(1):51. Retrieved from Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T. & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5):547-558 Blanchard, J.W., Petheric, J.T. & Basara, H. (2015). Stakeholder engagement: A model for tobacco policy planning in Oklahoma tribal communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(1S1): S44–S46. Bourne, L. (2015). Stakeholder theory: Series on stakeholder engagement. PM World Journal, IV(II). Retrieved from Centre for the Study of Social Policy and Western and Pacific Child Welfare Implementation Center, USA (2013). Stakeholder engagement: Tools for action. Retrieved on 05.02.2018 from Chan, J. (2016). A tool for the public policy process & stakeholder engagement: Using co-design methodologies and principles, how might we support policy makers and policy influencers to adopt a user-centred approach to the public policy process and build rapport between stakeholders?. Retrieved on 14.02.18 from Das, P. & Tamminga, K.R. (2012). The Ganges and the GAP: An assessment of efforts to clean a sacred river. Sustainability, 4:1647-1668; Dawes, S., Helbig, N., Shahin, J., Mkude, C., Cotterell, G., Klievink, B. & Dzhusupova, Z. (). Comparative Analysis of Stakeholder Engagement in Policy Development. Retrieved from Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1):70-71. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. Friedman, A.L. & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1): 1-21. Global Access Partners (2012). Progress in society. GAP Taskforce Report. Australia: Global Access Partners Pty Ltd. Governance Institute of Australia (2015). Good governance guide: Stakeholder engagement (public sector). Retrieved on 14.02.2018 from Griffiths, J., Maggs, H. & George, E. (2008). Stakeholder involvement. WHO Hauck, J., Saarikoski, H., Turkelboom, F. & Keune, H. (2016). Stakeholder involvement in ecosystem service decision-making and research. In Potschin, M. & K. Jax (Eds). OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book. Retrieved on 09.02.2018 from Jeffery, N. (2009). Stakeholder engagement: A road map to meaningful engagement. Cranfield School of Management: Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility. Retrieved from Larson, S. & Williams, L.J. (2009). Monitoring the success of stakeholder engagement: Literature review. In Measham, T.G. & Brake, L. (Eds.). People, Communities and Economies of the Lake Eyre Basin, DKCRC Research Report, 45:251-298. Alice Springs: Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre. Lemke, A. A. & Harris-Wai, J. N. (2015). Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Challenges and opportunities for human genomics. Genet Med, 17(12): 949-957. MacNicol, D., Giffin, G. & Mansell, P. (2014). Stakeholder engagement: RICS guidance note. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), UK. Malhotra, C. (2016). Public tools for open governance: Review of right to information act and social media in Indian context. Retrieved on 18.02.2018 from: Mathur, V.N., Price, A.D.F. and Austin, S.A. (2008). Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6):601-609. Mayers, J. (2005). Stakeholder power analysis. International Institute for Environment and Development. Retrieved on 18.02.2018 from Mitchell, R., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886. Mlynarkiewicz, L. D. (2013). Public awareness and stakeholder engagement in India's nuclear energy regulatory process. International Journal of Nuclear Law (IJNUCL), Vol. 4(1). Morris, J. & Baddache, F. (2012). Back to basics: How to make stakeholder engagement meaningful for your company. Retrieved from OECD (2015). Policy shaping and policy making: The governance of inclusive growth. Retrieved on 13.02.2018 from Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Schalk, J. (2011). Linking stakeholder involvement to policy performance: Nonlinear and stakeholder-specific effects in Dutch local government policy making. Retrieved on 18.02.2018 from Sequeira, D. & Warner M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: A good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington D.C:International Finance Corporation. Sevaly, S. (2001). Involving stakeholders in aquaculture policy-making, planning and management. In Subasinghe, R.P., Bueno, P., Phillips, M.J., Hough, C., McGladdery, S.E. & Arthur, J.R. (Eds.). Aquaculture in the Third Millennium. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, 20-25 February 2000. pp.83-93. NACA, Bangkok and FAO, Rome. Sinclair, M.L. (2010). Developing a Model for Effective Stakeholder Engagement Management., Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, Vol.11. Retrieved on 05.02.2018 from Talley, J.L., Schneider, J. & Lindquist, E. (2016). A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: The five-feature framework. Ecology and Society, 21(4):38. Unknown (2009). Converting global issues into business opportunities. Global Access Partners 2002-2008 Report. Australia: Global Access Partners Pty Ltd. Retrieved on 14.02.2018 from Unknown (2012). Framework for citizen engagement in e-governance. Department of Electronics & Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India. Verma, N., Singh, S. & Misra, D.P. (2008). Stakeholder empowerment through participatory governance: A case study. In Bhattacharya, J. (Ed.) Critical thinking in e-governance. Retrieved on 18.02.2018 from WuXun, W., James, R. & Ora-orn, P. (2017). Ganga Rejuvenation: Governance Challenges and Policy Options. World Scientific.
Primary Language en
Subjects Social
Journal Section Articles

Author: Aditi Tyagi
Country: India

Bibtex @research article { ijasos478238, journal = {IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences}, issn = {}, eissn = {2411-183X}, address = {OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research}, year = {2019}, volume = {4}, pages = {813 - 822}, doi = {10.18769/ijasos.478238}, title = {PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA}, key = {cite}, author = {Tyagi, Aditi} }
APA Tyagi, A . (2019). PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA. IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 4 (12), 813-822. DOI: 10.18769/ijasos.478238
MLA Tyagi, A . "PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA". IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 4 (2019): 813-822 <>
Chicago Tyagi, A . "PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA". IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 4 (2019): 813-822
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA AU - Aditi Tyagi Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.18769/ijasos.478238 DO - 10.18769/ijasos.478238 T2 - IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 813 EP - 822 VL - 4 IS - 12 SN - -2411-183X M3 - doi: 10.18769/ijasos.478238 UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA %A Aditi Tyagi %T PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA %D 2019 %J IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences %P -2411-183X %V 4 %N 12 %R doi: 10.18769/ijasos.478238 %U 10.18769/ijasos.478238
ISNAD Tyagi, Aditi . "PROSPECTS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC POLICY: A CASE OF INDIA". IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 4 / 12 (January 2019): 813-822.