Bu çalışmada, DevOps işletim hattı bütüncül bir yazılım ürünü olarak ele alınmakta; bugüne değin farklı araştırmacılar tarafından literatürde yayınlanmış olan ve DevOps işletim hattı üzerinde yürütülen süreçlerin başarımının izlenmesine yönelik olarak önerilmiş yazılım geliştirme ve ürün ölçütlerinin, ISO/IEC 25010 kalite bakış açısı ile hangi kavramlarla ilintilenebilir olduğu incelenmekte; bu kapsamda ISO/IEC 25010 kalite çerçevesinde hangi boyutlarda boşluklar kaldığına ve hangi hususlarda çalışmalar ve tanımlamalar yapılmasına ihtiyaç bulunduğu tespit edilmeye çalışılmaktadır.
Yazılım geliştirme süreci DevOps İşletim hattı Yazılım kalitesi Yazılım kalite güvencesi ISO/IEC 25010
Bulunmamaktadır.
Bulunmamaktadır.
Bulunmamaktadır.
In this study, DevOps pipeline is considered as an integrated software product; DevOps pipeline process performance metrics in the literature are examined with the perspective of ISO/IEC 25010. Considering the studies existing in the literature, an analysis is performed in order to identify the dimensions and aspects in which there exists some gaps and therefore, more effort is required.
: Software development process DevOps Pipeline Software quality Software quality assurance ISO/IEC 25010
Bulunmamaktadır.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Engineering |
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Project Number | Bulunmamaktadır. |
Early Pub Date | June 29, 2023 |
Publication Date | June 29, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 16 Issue: 1 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.