THE METHODS SECTIONS IN MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING RESEARCH ARTICLES: RHETORICAL VARIATIONS BETWEEN TWO SUB-DISCIPLINES OF BUSINESS
Abstract
Recently, studies on rhetorical structure of research articles (RAs) have attracted a great attention of researchers. Among the sections of RA, the Introduction section has been investigated extensively while much fewer studies have been done on the Methods section. Besides, the majority of the existing studies focus only on a single discipline or on a comparison between two disciplines. Very little, however, has been conducted to compare the rhetorical structure between two sub-disciplines from one academic field. In this study, therefore, the Methods sections from Management and Marketing, two sub-disciplines of business, were analyzed and compared to identify the rhetorical variations due to disciplinary concepts and practices between these two sub-disciplines. Two sets of corpus were compiled, each with ten Methods sections from two prestigious journals in the fields of Management and Marketing, respectively. Lim’s model (2006) for the rhetorical structure of the Methods section in Management was adopted as the analytical framework. Results of the analysis showed that the chosen analytical framework could not offer sufficient explanations for the rhetorical structure of the Methods sections in the two sub-disciplines of business, even revealing some discrepancies between the framework and the actual texts. Only 30% of the Methods sections in the Management corpus appeared to fit the selected model while in the Marketing corpus, the Methods sections had a greater diversity of rhetorical patterns due to the requirements for publishing in the two selected Marketing journals. The findings in this study may have some implications for writing the Methods sections in the business discipline, such as the need for explicit instruction of writing conventions of this particular section and the guidance to realize the rhetorical differences between these two sub-disciplines for more effective sub-discipline specific writing.
Keywords: The Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary VariationsReferences
- Basturkmen, H. (2012). “A Genre-Based Investigation of Discussion Sections of Research Articles in Dentistry
- and Disciplinary Variation”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11.
- Brett, P. (1994). “A Genre Analysis of the Result Section of Sociology Articles: A Corpus Study”. English for
- Specific Purposes, 13(1).
- Crookes, G. (1986). “Towards A Validated Analysis of Scientific Text Structure”. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1).
- Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). “Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles”. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (3).
- Lim, J. M. H. (2006). “Method Sections of Management Research Articles: A Pedagogical Motivated Qualitative Study”. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3).
- Lim, J. M. H. (2010). “Commenting on Research Results in Applied Linguistics and Education: A Comparative
- Genre-Based Investigation”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (4).
- Nwogu, K. N. (1997). “The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions”. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2).
- Peacock, M. (2002). “Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles”. System, 30 (4).
- Peacock, M. (2011). “The Structure of the Methods Section in Research Articles across Eight Disciplines”. The Asian ESP Journal, 7 (2).
- Posteguillo, S. (1999). “The Schematic Structure of Computer Science Research Articles”. English for Specific
- Purposes, 18 (2).
- Samraj, B. (2002). “Introductions in Research Articles: Variation across Disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes, 21.
- Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swales, J., Feak, C. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. (1990). Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Yang, R., Allison, D. (2003). “Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Moving From Results to Conclusions”. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (4).
Abstract
References
- Basturkmen, H. (2012). “A Genre-Based Investigation of Discussion Sections of Research Articles in Dentistry
- and Disciplinary Variation”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11.
- Brett, P. (1994). “A Genre Analysis of the Result Section of Sociology Articles: A Corpus Study”. English for
- Specific Purposes, 13(1).
- Crookes, G. (1986). “Towards A Validated Analysis of Scientific Text Structure”. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1).
- Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). “Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles”. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (3).
- Lim, J. M. H. (2006). “Method Sections of Management Research Articles: A Pedagogical Motivated Qualitative Study”. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3).
- Lim, J. M. H. (2010). “Commenting on Research Results in Applied Linguistics and Education: A Comparative
- Genre-Based Investigation”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (4).
- Nwogu, K. N. (1997). “The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions”. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2).
- Peacock, M. (2002). “Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles”. System, 30 (4).
- Peacock, M. (2011). “The Structure of the Methods Section in Research Articles across Eight Disciplines”. The Asian ESP Journal, 7 (2).
- Posteguillo, S. (1999). “The Schematic Structure of Computer Science Research Articles”. English for Specific
- Purposes, 18 (2).
- Samraj, B. (2002). “Introductions in Research Articles: Variation across Disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes, 21.
- Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swales, J., Feak, C. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. (1990). Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Yang, R., Allison, D. (2003). “Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Moving From Results to Conclusions”. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (4).
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2015 |
| Submission Date | August 30, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015Volume: 1 Issue: 2 |
Cited By
Didactic Oriented Study: Move and Transitivity Analysis of Method, Result, and Discussion Sections in Research Articles
European Journal of Educational Research
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1259
Contact: ijasosjournal@hotmail.com
The IJASOS Journal's site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015- 2025